Assessing your organisations impact
Detailed analysis of an organisation’s spending data can start to reveal where the less expected emissions might be being generated or hidden, something we found at Arup when we worked with SEQ Water in Australia. For example, a well-intentioned intervention in one part of the water system could cause additional carbon emissions somewhere else in the system. Building more pipes may be the only solution to make water supplies more resilient, but could actually increase emissions through construction and operation as a result.
How will a water company make decisions on such developments in the future? How will they justify decisions given their environmental responsibilities to shareholders who have invested interests in the profitability, not saving the planet? What about the impact upstream and downstream of their work too, and how will this be taken into account? Can they demonstrate that water is collected and managed in the most efficient manner within the catchment area, and what about how customers use that water once it is delivered to their properties and homes?
Water companies must understand and include supply chain partners – and users – in the assessment of their impact on emissions, and must work to find more efficient solutions at every step of the complete water cycle. A highly rigorous analysis is needed before any net zero plan is likely to work. It needs fresh thinking and innovation, not just system-wide, but water cycle and catchment-wide.
COP26: Will the UK lead the way?
Of course, it is not possible for some parts of the world to lead on reducing emissions related to water supply and management. For some, just having access to enough water for consumption and sanitation remains a struggle. It therefore falls on countries such as the United States, Australia and the UK. Given COP26 heads to Glasgow in 2021, now is the perfect time for the UK water sector to show how companies have come together to set their own goals, having recently published a route map for the sector.
Individual companies in the UK are now moving to develop their own net zero action plans, which are expected over the coming years. Anglian Water, which embraced the idea that working with the wider industry would strengthen their own future plans and positioning, is a great example. They decided to invest in the development of the PAS2080 guidance for carbon management in infrastructure – work that helped set their internal roadmap at the same time as bringing new clarity to an industry in transition.
The reality is that, despite it being a huge international challenge, there are few sectors in a greater position, and with greater motivation than the water sector to lead on the move towards Net Zero. The water sector is ultimately reliant on climate change being tackled with maximum effect, as the impacts of too much and too little water affect them more than any other industry.
One of the major opportunities is for organisations in the water sector with major land holdings to become more creative with their existing assets and land. Green infrastructure must be pushed harder, land must be put to better use, renewable energy such as solar power and onshore wind generation needs to be embraced more, and efforts need to be made for related industries in complementary fields to work in greater collaboration, such as energy and water, or energy, water and transport. New ideas need to be developed, but most importantly of all, the issue needs to be tackled holistically and collectively. No individual organisation in the water sector can stand alone in its work – a net zero approach must be at the heart of the water catchment and lead the way to a more sustainable future.